Most nonprofits apply for one grant at a time. If they get it, great. If they don't, funding stalls for months. The problem isn't your mission — it's your strategy. Single-source funding is the #1 reason nonprofits stay underfunded. One grantor says no and the whole program pauses. Here's what most applicants don't know: grantors actually prefer organizations with multiple funding sources — it signals stability, not desperation.
- 1
Most grantors publicly list their priorities, deadlines, and award ranges
That information is sitting in publicly available databases and foundation websites — and most nonprofits never look. Knowing where to look is half the strategy.
What is grant stacking? → - 2
Small grants ($500–$5,000) are often the easiest to win
Small grants build the track record that unlocks bigger ones. Most nonprofits skip right past them chasing the $50,000 award they're not ready for yet.
How to write your first grant proposal → - 3
Grant stacking — applying to multiple funders for the same program — is not just allowed
Most grantors encourage it. They want to see that other funders believe in your work too. It's not double-dipping — it's how the system is designed to work.
Going from "we need funding" to "we have a grant pipeline" is a system, not luck. It requires knowing which grants fit, how to sequence applications, and how to write budgets that work across multiple funders at once. Most nonprofits don't have that system. CFWM built one — and it's in the playbook. The Grant Stacking Playbook walks you through exactly how to identify funders, layer them strategically, and build a pipeline that doesn't depend on any single yes. It's the strategy grantors don't advertise — but they respect.